https://comment.ctrl.blog/discussion/firefox-linux-flatpak-snap?api=feed2023-07-07T12:54:00ZFirefox contained in Flatpak vs Snap comparison (Discussion thread)https://comment.ctrl.blog/discussion/firefox-linux-flatpak-snap#comment-7412023-07-07T12:54:00ZBriainNew comment on: Firefox contained in Flatpak vs Snap comparison<p>Using LM 21.1, I tried flatpak Firefox and it worked very well, but the downside was that I couldn't resolve LAN DNS (I believe this is down to the sand-boxing) so I tried the snap Firefox and that seems to work equally and in addition, I can now access LAN DNS. I'd tend to go with the flatpak version as I really do love security, but I use LAN DNS to access local devices several times per day and it was just too much of a hassle to lose it, so I'll stick with the snap variant. :-)</p>
<hr>
<p><a href="https://comment.ctrl.blog/discussion/firefox-linux-flatpak-snap#comment-741">Reply and view the full discussion</a>.</p>https://comment.ctrl.blog/discussion/firefox-linux-flatpak-snap#comment-3202022-05-10T22:24:00ZAnonymousNew comment on: Firefox contained in Flatpak vs Snap comparison<p>With Ubuntu now shipping Firefox Snap as the default, would you consider releasing an updated article on the security and privacy of Snap vs Flatpak versions?</p>
<hr>
<p><a href="https://comment.ctrl.blog/discussion/firefox-linux-flatpak-snap#comment-320">Reply and view the full discussion</a>.</p>